Shadow of the Vampire
release year:2000 genre:vampire drama viewing setting:theater, 2/1/2001 what I expected:no idea what I got:one of the most interesting and eerie documentaries I'll ever see
synopsis:Remeber that groundbreaking silent horror movie from 1922, Nosferatu? Well, this is a fictional documentary of the making of it, with one twist: the director used a real vampire for his lead.
impressions:Entertaining. This wasn't a vampire movie, not really, but it had those elements. It was more of a movie about a clash of wills and the making of movies (in general and in 1922.) It had scary moments, but also some surprisingly deep ones.
acting:As many have stated, Willem Dafoe did indeed give the performance of a lifetime here; his Schreck/Orlok is both creepy and human. John Malkovich was the insanely obsessed director F.W. Murnau.
final word:Worth seeing, whether you're a vampire fan, a moviemaking fan, or only a little of both.
back to the main reviews page